Welcome to Seashell-Collector.com

Optimized for 1024*768

Last Update : 01/02/2010 17:55

General
Home Page
Interviews
Book Reviews
Online Articles (html)
Offine Articles (pdf)

Identification Help (forum)
Online Chat Room
Online Forum
Shell Dealers

Live-Seashells
Live Seashell Database
SeaShells Galleries
Mediterranean SeaShells
LSPOTM Archives

Links & Contacts
Shells Dealers on web
Worldwide Collectors
Shells Related Links
Contact Author
About Author
Advertising

Miscellaneous
My Conidae Database
My entire collection
The Cone Collector
Shells' FAQ
Beginner's Corner
Hunting Seashells
Cleaning Seashells
Storing Seashells
Taxonomy & Latin
Free Wallpapers
Identification Help
Website history

Forum
Shells identification Help
Shell General Discussion
Shell trips
Worldwide Shell Shows
Sea Shells Trading
Sea Shells Selling/buying
Land Shells Trading
Land Shells Selling/buying
Live Seashells Photo.
Pour les francophiles




Gem Centre Sea Shell


FAQ PAGE 2
This Page contains following topics :
The meaning of terms like Fine, Gem, ++ etc...
FLAWS ON CYPRAEIDAE

The meaning of terms like Fine, Gem, ++ etc...

(Hi ! I am a beginner at shelling. I don't understand some terms on this hobby. May be some one can help me out ! For example, what is gem quality on shell, is that means it has no scar or good color ?)

"gem" means flawless, an absolutely perfect specimen with no defects discernable, even upon close inspection.

"fine" means minor flaws, either natural (like scars from healed injuries) or post-collection damage (minor chips on the lip of a cone shell, or fine scratches on a cowrie) which do not greatly detract from the scientific or aesthetic value of the specimen, and which are not readily apparent except upon close inspection.

"good" means that major defects are present, but the principle identifying characteristics of the species are still intact.

"+" can be used to represent grades intermediate between the principle grades mentioned above. "fine +" means "better than fine, but not quite gem". "Fine++" would mean "virtually gem", for example one minute flaw that would be difficult to find, even upon close inspection. "Good +" means better than good, but not good enough to be listed as "fine".

Some dealers use additional "+" signs - "fine +++", which makes the point that the shell is virtually gem, but I personally think it gets a bit silly after two "+" signs. A shell that is "fine +++++++++" should just be listed as "fine ++". That makes the point adequately. Now and then someone uses "gem -", which really means the same thing as "fine ++".

The system is somewhat subjective, and one dealer's "fine++" is another dealer's "fine+". After a bit of experience, you learn just how meticulous a particular dealer is in his grading of specimen shells
(Answer by M. Paul Monfils via the Forum)

FLAWS ON CYPRAEIDAE

(Original Forum Question : TO ALL SPECIALIST OF CYPRAEA. HAVE YOU EVERED CHECK YOUR CYPRAEA SPECIMENS WITH THE AID OF A FLOURESCENT LIGHT? I DID. DID YOU NOTICED SMALL SCRATCH MARKS EITHER ON THE DORSUM OR ON THE BASE. THESE SCRATCH MARKS IS TO SMALL TO BE CALLED A SCAR, A DING, AND INFACT, I DOUBT IF THERE IS A TERM FOR THIS AND IS TOTALLY INVISIBLE IF THE SHELLS IS ONE OR TWO FEET AWAY FROM YOUR EYES. THESES MARKS LOOK LIKE NEEDLE MARKS MADE BY SCRATCHING A NEEDLE ON GLASSES. IF THESE MARKS ARE TO NUMEROUS, IT ALWAYS, IF NOT SOMETIMES, AFFECT THE CYPRAEAS SHEEN. I REALLY DON'T KNOW IF THESE ARE JUST NATURAL AND NOT TO BE MINDED IN GRADING CYPRAEA OR ARE FLAWS WHICH IS THE EFFECT IF THE SHELL HAS RUB ON SOMETHING SHARP OR EVEN OTHER CYPRAEA. CAN ANYONE HELP ME? I HAVE MANY CYPRAEA IN MY COLLECTION AND NON OF THEM HAS BEEN GRADED GEM AND A FEW ARE JUST LUCKY TO BE GRADED GEM-/FINE+++. I AM ALREADY HAPPY TO AQUIRE A FINE++ CYPRAEA. ARE THESES MARKS FLAW OR JUST NATURAL? ANYONE?)

These tiny hairline scratches on the nacre can be either from natural or manmade causes. If the shell brushes against coral or falls onto sand or is buffeted by surf-tossed sand, such minute scratches can occur. Sand grains, being largely quartz and similar minerals, are much harder than the surface of the shell. But they can also occur from contact with mildly abrasive surfaces after collecting - sliding the shell across a tabletop, handling it with jewelry on your fingers, or even wiping the shell with a cloth that isn't soft enough or has some fine dirt or grit on it. Remember that the shell grading system is based on ordinary visual inspection - no flaws that can be detected upon close examination with the unaided eye. Special lighting may reveal some minute flaws that may not be seen otherwise; and magnification almost always will. Give me a good 20X microscope and I'll find flaws on any Cypraea, "gem" or not.
(Answer by M. Paul Monfils via the Forum)







© SEASHELL-COLLECTOR.COM, ALL RIGHTS RESERVED Repeatbottom
All images on this website are fully protected by copyright laws, Any unauthorized use of these images is strictly prohibited